Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
Esper Pixie | kthanakit26 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
Azorius Omniscience | dazai | 9-1 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
Esper Pixie | gyrabbit47 | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
Esper Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Bant Toxic | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
4 Color Omniscience , 5 Color Legends , Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Cage , Azorius Control
Seachrome Coast ranks #406 out of approximately 405 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Colorless average: 63.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Seachrome Coast is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 35.36 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.3%. Seachrome Coast has a win rate of 72.7%, making it 2.2% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 5 | 96.0% | 4 |
Slaughter Singer | Creature — Phyrexian Cleric | 5 | 80.0% | 4 |
Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 43 | 74.8% | 17 |
Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 44 | 74.1% | 17 |
Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 22 | 73.9% | 10 |
Phyrexian Dragon Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Dragon | 9 | 73.8% | 5 |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 45 | 73.6% | 16 |
Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 38 | 73.5% | 12 |
Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 34 | 72.7% | 10 |
Final Showdown | Instant | 5 | 70.8% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Seachrome Coast than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 8 | 82.9% | 73.2% | +9.7% |
Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 9 | 78.7% | 73.5% | +5.2% |
Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 7 | 77.4% | 72.6% | +4.9% |
Raise the Past | Sorcery | 4 | 9 | 81.1% | 77.5% | +3.6% |
Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 27 | 76.4% | 73.1% | +3.3% |
Season of Weaving | Sorcery | 6 | 7 | 78.6% | 75.6% | +2.9% |
Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 14 | 79.6% | 77.2% | +2.5% |
Regal Bunnicorn | Creature — Rabbit Unicorn | 2 | 9 | 79.2% | 76.9% | +2.4% |
Pest Control | Sorcery | 2 | 16 | 71.8% | 69.7% | +2.1% |
Warden of the Inner Sky | Creature — Human Soldier | 1 | 11 | 78.6% | 76.5% | +2.1% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 1551 | 99.3% | 54.7% |
Jeskai Convoke | 547 | 98.4% | 48.5% |
Azorius Tempo | 394 | 99.0% | 41.8% |
Azorius Control | 361 | 95.0% | 53.5% |
Azorius Omniscience | 350 | 99.2% | 51.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.